Indeed - unless they have foot=yes, foot=permissive, access=permissive (etc) or designation=public_footpath, we are in no way telling them that they are public access.
It is completely unreasonable for landowners to have a go at us just for showing a path on the map. Just because it's on the map, it doesn't implicitly mean it's public. ________________________________ From: Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> Sent: 02 October 2016 11:33:37 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Upper Booth camp site, Pennine Way near Edale Frederik Ramm quoted Mr Angry: > "NONE of the paths indicated on the map that proceed north through > Upper Booth Farm are public footpaths" And indeed they're not tagged as such: they are tagged as the perennially useless highway=path, some of them with highway=permissive, while the Pennine Way PRoW is tagged (correctly) as highway=footway, foot=yes. I suspect this is as least as much an osm-carto rendering issue as it is a mapping issue. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Upper-Booth-camp-site-Pennine-Way-near-Edale-tp5883692p5883715.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
