On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian was referring to "street" relations, not "associatedStreet" which > is something very different.
So I failed to make my point. I was hoping to explain that while there is some support for associatedStreets and there is no support for street-relations. I disagree somewhat that they are *very* different, as I have seen several people trying to express "everything belonging/associated to a street" with both relations. I see them more as 2 implementations of the same concept. regards m _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
