On 22/11/2016 13:41, David Woolley wrote:
On 22/11/16 12:45, Dave F wrote:
Please clarify exactly what data you believe to be personal? As it
contains no data on "identifiable living people", could you provide
evidence that it falls under the DPA?
Occupation.
There's no correlation to an individual
(Real name and address can be obtained by anyone from the edited
electoral register and I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to get them
from the full one.)
That can be done without the FHRS:ID.
Proprietor's home address.
Leaving the FHRS:ID out of OSM does not prevent the information being
freely available (as you clearly pointed out)
Are you now suggesting the electoral roll should be hidden? Please don't
assume duplicating freely available data in OSM makes it 'personal' or
somehow tainted.
DaveF.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
