Hi Andy, I suspect that, as a marketing company, they know exactly what they're doing (though having said that their address is 2 Wellington Place which they have on their own website as 2 Wellington Street). However, I've left a changeset comment with a recommendation that they map their office as a POI instead.
I'll revert the changeset (47688939) if no action in 7 days. Regards, *Paul* On 26 April 2017 at 14:17, Andy Townsend <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/04/2017 14:08, Paul Berry wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I presume egregious additions such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/w >> ay/40235088 can just be reverted, deleted, or otherwise reduced in >> impact (eg converting to a POI rather than an area) without further comment >> or is there a procedure for this? >> > > Well that's clearly a rubbish edit so I'd just revert it. If there > actually is something visible at the address given then that might be worth > mapping, perhaps as office=company, but if there isn't I wouldn't even do > that (it does match their website though). > > The first time with these I normally "assume good faith" and comment in > the changeset suggesting that they have accidentally renamed an area. They > are new to OSM - it might (just might) have been accidental. > > If they keep making these sort of edits then mail the DWG to get them > blocked (or worse). > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
