On 15 May 2017 at 12:38, SK53 <[email protected]> wrote: > Failure to directly contact this list at the same time as imports is > extremely discourteous.
This supposes that the data importer/ donor is are of this list. > Changing of source tag is unacceptable for mapper surveyed locations. The *addition* of a source is surely acceptable? > Website should only be used if the url identifies the actual location. I don't think anyone disputes this one. > My personal preference for this type of thing would not be an import per se, > but tools which allow mappers to enrich data from such datasets. This may well be a solution, in this case, which satisfies both "camps". We have precedence in the addition of cycle-shop data, a few years back. Wasn't the tool used for that made available subsequently, as open-source? However, this solution won't scale well, for things like the recent tree import. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
