It's been done: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51951288.
Unfortunately reading the comments I noticed a remark about a No. 441A and I realised my interpolation must have had an error. On checking I found that I'd placed the known address one house over. This means that continuing the interpolation means that the last house on the Bolton side is 445. As the 441/441a is from an OS Map of uncertain date I felt I couldnt use that as input. My suspicion is that the numbering coincidence was deliberate. There are long gaps on the Bolton side which would surely have allowed them to chose any particular number range. Jerry On 13 September 2017 at 09:18, Andrew Hain <andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > Anyone up to filling in http://www.openstreetmap.org/# > map=16/53.5308/-2.3532 then? > > -- > Andrew > ------------------------------ > *From:* Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> > *Sent:* 12 September 2017 22:22:35 > *To:* OSM GB mailing list > *Subject:* [Talk-GB] "an extraordinary quirk in the UK address system" > > This may interest some of you: > > http://www.paulplowman.com/stuff/house-address-twins-proximity/ > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb