>I recommended BY for consistency with the other two-letter >abbreviations (FP, BR, RB) that were more universal.
+1 Given that there is little internal consistency within each LA and that these are rarely even marked on the ground, my preference would be to stick with the standard as described on the wiki unless this does not fit with a LA. For Warwickshire CC I [1] came to a different prow_ref than Robert W [2]. Where Robert went with just SD91a, I opted for FP Combrook SD91a as that fitted with the wiki standard. Finally, I understand that FP etc can be determined from the designation tag but I do not see this as a reason to omit the data. It is useful to the end user, just as the M in ref=M1 is for motorways!! So, in summary, can't we just stick to what we previously agreed and diverge only when this clearly doesn't work for a participial LA (or which I expect that to be very rare). Thanks, Rob [1] https://www.loomio.org/d/jUifS6tM/prow-map [2] http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/warks/stratford-on-avon/stratford-on-avon-rural-district/
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
