Thanks for that Simon - is that just your personal opinion? Should I contact LWG for an official OSMF position?
On 15 February 2018 at 09:03, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > AFAIK we've not had any data licensed on ODC-BY 1.0 imported, at least not > on a larger scale. > > The ODC-BY licence was supposed to be compatible with distribution on ODBL > terms just as CC BY should be with CC BY-SA (I would however argue that > both do not actually meet that goal), so most terms are similar to the > ODBL. I do believe that we would at least need a statement that central > attribution as we provide it is OK with the data source as the ODC-BY terms > do not seem to cater for this. > > Simon > > Am 14.02.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Brian Prangle: > > Hi > > Following my blog criticising BT > <http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/the-streets-they-are-changing.html> > for not releasing data, Inlink UK <http://www.inlinkuk.com/> have been > in touch saying they'd be only too glad to release their data so we can use > it in OSM. They've asked the following question which floors me.Can anyone > help? I don't think this one was on the list of compatible licences on the > wiki > > To assist with this are you able to indicate whether you currently use any > data provided under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0) or similar > licenses providing data attribution and, if so, how they interact with the > information you release under ODC-ODBL 1.0? > > Regards > > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing > listTalk-GB@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
