Forgot to add: Elsewhere, someone suggested using kiln=bottle_kiln and building=industrial instead of building=bottle_kiln. Any thoughts?
Russ On 6 April 2018 at 07:38, Russ Phillips <russ.phillips.nos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, I'm now thinking I'll tag as: > > building=bottle_kiln > kiln=pottery > disused:man_made=kiln > former_product=pottery > historic=kiln > > and add tourism=museum where appropriate. > > Ideally > I'd have the building as a way. > Then the kiln as a node with the product. > This allows the building to remain 'intact' while the kiln could go > disused to abandoned depending on how bad it is. > I note that the kiln requires more than the building, for example heat > proofing, venting. > > Most of the bottle kilns in Stoke-on-Trent are stand-alone brick > structures, and the whole building is the kiln. They were filled with > pottery, the doorway was bricked up, and fires were lit at the bottom. > > However, this brings up a related point. Some bottle kilns are inside > another building (eg the one at Moorcroft: https://www.flickr. > com/photos/83551695@N00/4794476050/) How would I map those? I'm guessing > I'd have two ways - one for the outer building, and one for the bottle > kiln, with a relation to tie them together. If so, what type of relation > should I use? > > Thanks for all the help and advice. > > Russ > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb