I was under the impression entrance nodes is the only place to put addr:flats? In the absence of entrance nodes, of course, it makes sense to tag the outline, but some apartment blocks might have weird layouts where you can’t do that. Would building:part solve your problem?
Ant > 18 апр. 2018 г., в 12:03, Derick Rethans <o...@derickrethans.nl>: > >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Andrew Hain wrote: >> >> I have been mapping a complex of flats that consists of a series of >> blocks each with its own entrance, tagging each section with >> addr:housename and addr:flats >> [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580234651]. The standard layer >> repeats the name of the whole block for each section, which I find a >> bit clunky (Humanitarian doesn’t label anything at all). Before I >> discuss this with the map renderers, am I doing the best thing for >> tagging? > > Yes, I think so. I have a similar situation here: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.53422/-0.19844 > > Although I mapped the whole building there with its name, and then each > entrance separately as I don't know where the sections are exactly. > > I wrote a style change some time ago too: > https://derickrethans.nl/flats.html — but nothing on that front has > improved yet :-/ > > I wish it would render similarly to > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282084602#map=19/51.52662/-0.18901&layers=D > perhaps :-/ > > cheers, > Derick > > -- > https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io > Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: https://xdebug.org/donate.php, > or become my Patron: https://www.patreon.com/derickr > twitter: @derickr and @xdebug > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
