> On 29/05/18 14:53, Tony Shield wrote: >> >> At the end of this week (2nd June) I intend to change the platforms I know >> to remove covered=yes, if you disagree please challenge. >
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the issue seems to be that the carto change works on the assumption that covered=yes implies the feature isn't visible (e.g. because partly underground), whereas others may be are working on the assumption that covered=yes means you won't get rained on (e.g. there is some kind of roof)? The wiki seems pretty clear actually - it only really talks about the first of the two meanings. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered I'm not aware of any "UK-local" consensus to be different about that. I personally haven't use the "covered" tag (no reason), but I do add building=roof objects to some train stations. Dan _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
