Hi, If this is to be mapped shouldn't it be as a historic feature rather than a (current) road route?
By the way I tend to use loc_name for a colloquial name regardless of whether it is just used by local people. Kind regards, Adam On 25 June 2018 at 15:59, Paul Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > Someone's had a brave go at defining that very relation: > http://osm.org/relation/2776562 > > Feel free to extend it, bearing in mind the Great North Road != A1 (M or > otherwise). > > Regards, > *Paul* > > On 25 June 2018 at 14:44, David Woolley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 25/06/18 14:13, Stuart Reynolds wrote: >> >>> So how should I tag this? I want to have the correct name for the >>> sections of A1, yet I don’t know how far these extend (my data lists the >>> street names at points, not over lengths), and equally I don’t want to lose >>> the Great North Road tag - just to demote it. >>> >>> >> I would say that the name should be that which is locally sign posted, >> for which you will need an on the ground survey. >> >> I think I would agree with the discussion that suggests "Great North >> Road" for the entirety, should be a [route] relation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
