I am pondering a similar but simpler question. I would like to add a table listing each authority at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref describing the conventions used. With a subpage if there is a lot of info such as Toby's list for Lancashire
I have added the first prow_ref for Bromley (outer london and not OGL). As there are no parishes, I have adopted the same convention as Croydon which is *LB Bromley FP 120B* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41799727 On 11 July 2018 at 18:38, Tony Shield <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Love MapthePaths; in Lancashire the path is presented as "Public footpath, > ref 9-8 18", I have manually translated this to the prow_ref of "Charnock > Richard FP 18". I have performed this conversion by looking at Barry > Cornelius's data file and extracting District and Parish ID's and matched > them to the 9-8 element of the ID. I have a spreadsheet of the DIstrict and > Parish combinations - is there somewhere I can place it to help others? > Alternatively could MapthePaths be modified to use the parish name instead > of the District/Parish ID numbers. > > I noted there are 231 parishes and unparished towns, some with only one > footpath. Some of the parish names are mis-spelt eg BYRNING-WITH-WARTON > should be Bryning . . . > > > Regards > > Tony Shield > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
