It should be noted that many pharmacies appear in FHRS data, often with "Exempt" status.
Jerry On 6 August 2018 at 23:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < [email protected]> wrote: > On 6 August 2018 at 09:39, Philip Withnall <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the updates! A quick question about pharmacy matching: are > > we supposed to add the GPhC registration number of the pharmacy to its > > node/way in OSM, similarly to how we do FHRS IDs? There seems to be no > > guidance for/against this on your page for pharmacies. > > There's no licence to be able to use the GPhC register as used in > https://osm.mathmos.net/pharmacy/ directly in OSM. IIRC, I asked about > it a while ago and the response from GPhC was that individual > pharmacies owned the address data they submitted, so they weren't in a > position to licence it themselves. You might take the view that the > numbers themselves aren't copyrightable, though there would still be > database rights in the list as a whole, and there would be the > question of how you match them to OSM objects without using the other > address data. I thought this was a bit of a grey area, so I haven't > been suggesting people add the numbers, and the tool doesn't make use > of them for the matching. The tool does use postcodes for matching, as > these may be obtainable from other sources. I've found a lot have FHRS > registrations for example -- see > https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/ . > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
