Hi, On 10.01.19 01:18, Warin wrote: > Even if it were open .. does OSM want it?
Parcel boundaries have generally been undesirable in OSM in the past, mostly because to a lack of on-the-ground verifiability. The advice has always been: If there's a fence, map the fence, not the boundary. If there's no fence, then you don't know there's a boundary. If someone needs the boundaries they can use them them from the open data source themselves. That doesn't mean that people have not imported parcels of course. I think that in a discussion on talk-us, someone once claimed that it can be important to know for a rambler if they're on public or private land because they're more likely to get shot on private land. Hope this is not so much of a concern in the UK ;) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
