Don't use landuse=grass.
Use surface=grass and/or landcover=grass to state the land cover, I'd
use these with the power=plant tag.
(For those that don't know .. I hate the tag landuse=grass)
On 05/04/19 02:38, SK53 wrote:
Yup, I don't think industrial is appropriate in many circumstances,
any more than it would be for an area of wind turbines on moorland.
For instance I've seen sheep grazing in between the panels (which IIRC
are mounted on heliostats) on this solar farm:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168359464#map=15/39.8239/-5.6562&layers=N.
I presume that after installation the ground is more-or-less as it was
(not for instance contaminated as is the case of many rural industrial
areas, nor with traffic of heavy goods vehicles).
Jerry
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 16:25, Russ Garrett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 16:18, Mateusz Konieczny
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Why not? If area is covered by solar panels then it is used for
power generation.
> And power generation seems clear case of industrial use
I guess it is. I just think "industrial" carries a number of
connotations which solar power doesn't have. Also, in some cases the
land under/around solar farms is used for grazing, or at any rate it's
still mostly grass. I'm not too bothered either way, though.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
