On 2019-06-01 13:32, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> You're talking about a different subject, which 'associatedstreets' won't
> resolve.
Are you sure? Maybe you would restate concisely the problem as you see
it. The relation linked to in Jez' original post was
type=associatedStreet and he actually referred to a broader range of
objects, many of which don't have addresses as such. Why should an
explicit link between a building (or any other object) and the street it
is associated with be a bad thing, if computational geometry may lead to
an incorrect result? I would not like to think that the accuracy of the
location of these objects should be compromised so it yields the
"expected" results for a given set of circumstances.
C.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
