Hi, It looks like tagging for the renderer to me. It might look nicer with the standard rendering but in order to get this to look the desired way we now have 2 natural=heaths named as nature reserves and with operator tags but without nature reserve tags.
Kind regards, Adam On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 08:50, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 7 Jun 2019, 20:11 by [email protected]: > > It's possible to see the property boundaries on old maps, but after > visiting the site again yesterday I can find little remaining physical > evidence of the boundaries, with many footpaths crossing between them. > > The web sites refer to them being seamlessly linked together with > connecting footpaths. > > So I have changed the OSM mapping to show a single nature reserve, with > the individual reserve names applied to the land parcels within it > > So you would also delete it altogether in case where there is no border > visible at all for outside way? > > This is not how nature reserve mapping is typically done. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
