I see little value for all of these except fhrs:rating_date which is scarcely used. The local authority to which a rating belongs can be directly determined from OSM most of the time, but may be useful in Northern Ireland where we have no good usable data on LA boundaries.
I would rather that if they are to be removed it is when data is updated (i.e. by the editor discard list). I do have a collection of extracts of FHRS data going back to 2013, but have not been updating these regularly for some time. They are useful for providing address details & sometimes as a cross check that a place has genuinely gone out of business (e.g., a note to the effect that a pub has closed). Jerry On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 15:19, Andrew Hain <[email protected]> wrote: > Are the keys fhrs:rating (3358 occurences in Taginfo), fhrs:inspectiondate > (1748), fhrs:confidence_management, fhrs:hygiene, fhrs:structural (621 > each) and fhrs:rating_date (22) better off removed from our database, or > should they be kept for businesses that disappear from FHRS listings when > still open? > > What about fhrs:local_authority_id (11724)? > > Is fhrs:authority (12981) useful for businesses on borders? [ > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/807942] > > Should any that are not kept be removed in bulk or added th discarded > lists in editors? > > -- > Andrew > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
