5 Sep 2019, 00:40 by [email protected]: > Out of interest, is OS's position on derived data clearly the correct one > legally speaking? I note the wiki talks in terms of OS 'claiming' IP in the > derived data, not that it actually *is* their IP, so I wondered. > As far as copyright goes, this seems fairly logical - without having copyright on derived data one would be allowed to trace OSM/Google maps/other copyrighted map, get exact copy and claim that it is free from any copyright/database rights/any legal limitations.
That seems to be an obvious truck-sized loophole that is probably not supposed to exist.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
