I have had a quick look at the cycle parking too. A few comments: - You suggest "bicycle_parking=stands" for 3 cases of the TfL data: Stands, "M stands" and "P stands". I shall let others comment on whether we want to introduce new OSM tags for these. Perhaps cyclists have an interest if one is preferable to another. (See: https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid/conversion/#prk_mstand) - bicycle_parking=locker implies individual compartments for each bike. I was about to suggest that this doesn't therefore seem right for TfL's "hanger" (https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid/conversion/#prk_hangar). Was going to suggest just bicycle_parking=stands + covered=yes. However a look at the images suggests that these are all from a single rental company and that they are secure spaces which you rent out (see https://cyclehoop.force.com/RentalsCommunity/resultsmap?postalCode=se1 ) given how many there are I am sure London mappers will already have come up with a tagging solution... Maybe just locker as you propose and not worrying about the fact that 6 bikes share a single locker. Shed seems to be the alternate option here. - bicycle_parking=cyclehoop seems like a suitable new tag but again I'll let others comment as they may have already used some other tag for these. - For Secure I would consider bicycle_parking=shed instead of locker. The description on the wiki seems to fit better here ("A custom-built closed shed...").
Rest looks fine to me and the above is not a blocker - just something to encourage others to look and have their say. Thank you, *Rob* On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 22:27, Rob Nickerson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I've started to look at this but only got as far as Advanced Stop Lines > (ASL) and Crossings. I've raised issues on the GitHub: > https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues > > So far of the new tags I have only reviewed ASL position > (left/right/center). I'm not a fan of the new tag as I think the name is > wrong and (more importantly it doesn't allow for mixed cases such as Right > AND Left). The TfL guide suggests mixed cases are possible. Can you see any > in the data? > > Given that we are talking about the position that the cycle lane feeder > joins the ASL "reserviour" then my suggestion is to use: > > - asl:feeder:right = yes > - asl:feeder:left = yes > > Or some such like. > > Best regards, > *Rob* >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
