We can check for properties where the brand:wikidata tag was left behind by 
checking the other tags, particularly name= and shop=.

--
Andrew
________________________________
From: SK53 <[email protected]>
Sent: 28 September 2019 17:32
To: Silent Spike <[email protected]>
Cc: Talk GB <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

The specific problem with that suggestion is that you miss lots of Thomas Cook 
shops (particularly old Co-op Travel & Ilkeston Co-op travel): it hits about 3 
within 15 miles of Nottingham whereas there are nearer 11 (for obvious 
reasons), and one of those is apparently is 
not<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116307151/history> now a travel agent.

This latter aspect shows that editors other than iD may not surface 
Wikipedia/wikidata tags & that therefore such data needs to be cross-checked, 
and bulk edits may inadvertently change other things. In many ways I prefer 
that we acquire new local mappers (like OftenResident in Alfreton) who notice 
that an area is out-of-date & set about getting it up-to-date, rather than 
doing a partial update and missing other info (like the shop is now a 
hairdresser). Obviously others think we should keep everything as up-to-date as 
the information we have available. I don't think we have ever reached a 
consensus on this.

Jerry

On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 16:41, Silent Spike 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's unclear to me if there's a consensus on the tagging here. Personally I 
like the `disused:` prefix.

I couldn't see if it was mentioned anywhere, but we can also query for all the 
locations explicitly marked as part of the Thomas Cook brand using the 
`brand:wikidata` tag: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/MFP

All of the results here can really be automatically re-tagged as disused or 
vacant since we explicitly know they were locations belonging to Thomas Cook 
(the beauty of wikidata tagging). You might say some may already have been sold 
and re-signed, but that can always be tagged after - we at least know for 
certain that none of them are Thomas Cook travel agency shops anymore.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to