Change it to building=yes + disused:building=apartments ?...it's still a building, but the original use is now disused?
- Jez On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 14:51 Gareth L, <[email protected]> wrote: > There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents > ahead of eventual demolition of the buildings. They’re not coming back into > use due to issues with their construction. > http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo They’re > boarded up to secure them in the interim. > > All the guidance I can find on the abandoned or disused tags are to leave > the building as defined but to use abandoned/disused prefix on the amenity. > > These didn’t have an amenity though. They do still exist on the ground, > but no longer function as apartments. > > I’d like to use construction style tagging, but it doesn’t feel quite > right looking at all examples I’ve found. e.g. > Building=disused > Disused=apartments > > What have you used for buildings which are awaiting demolition, or are > undergoing a protracted demolition process but are not amenities? > > Gareth > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
