I think 3 nodes. While all operated by the one company .. do they all have the same fees, opening hours, contact details?

The building can have the address .. and the company if it has all of the building. But each facility can have its own node or area (if you have that detail).

The bar and restaurant may be separate facilities too, if so may them as separate nodes too (or areas again if you have that detail).

On 30/12/19 04:27, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi

In your example they're all different companies with different addresses & contact details, FHRS etc Tony's is one company, one address etc, so I think it should be one node, or if mappable, a building part area.. The facilities should be listed in sub tags - bar=yes, restaurant=yes  etc

On 29/12/2019 11:20, Chris Fleming wrote:
On 29/12/19 at 10:40am, Tony OSM wrote:

   Hi

   In Chorley a new entertainment business has opened -
   https://www.escapeentertainmentvenue.co.uk/

   It's primary offering is TenPin bowling, Gator Adventure golf (a form
   of indoor golf) and a bar & restaurant.

   What is the best way to tag? One node or three nodes?

   The new building is multi-tenanted and includes M&S Food and a cinema
   (already tagged).

I would tend to map these all as individual nodes. An example is here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.94187/-3.21604&layers=N

Sometimes, it makes sense to tag the building with the main occupant
then add any cafe's or restaurants as nodes, in your case this would be
the bowling then add the others as nodes. I would also tend to do this
for a big store which may also have a cafe or restaurant.

Cheers
Chris



_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb



_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to