I agree with Adam. In the published path orders fixed to lamposts etc
the written description includes parish, type, number. Sometimes in that
order sometimes type, number, parish. There is no consistency.
Parish, type, number is likely to be understood by every user of OSM and
I have used it in communication with Lancs CC who appear to understand it.
Regards
TonyS999
On 10/05/2020 12:03, Adam Snape wrote:
Hi,
There was a discussion on this list about this not long ago. I agree
with Rob's preference for parish, type, number as it is more idiomatic
and reflects how the routes are most commonly actually referred to in
communication. As Rob noted, the council doesn't use the numeric
references with any consistency even within its own electronic systems
(with the format on the online map being at variance with the
underlying dataset). I can confirm that neither the definitive maps
nor statements for Lancashire use any such references.
Kind regards,
Adam
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
