Probably? I am not familiar with the disputed territories process for Osm. It’s a weird one as only the U.K. has claimed sovereignty. Others don’t accept the claim, but also haven’t made a sovereignty claim themselves. So at the moment, the U.K. is the administrator - and there is an absence of any others.
I’d say it should remain mapped as U.K. administrative boundary but also flagged as disputed.. if that can be done? Gareth On 15 Jun 2020, at 10:24, Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: A new mapper has changed the status of Rockall, removing it from the UK admin boundaries. As I understand it Rockall is accepted as UK territory although it can't be used as a baseline to extend the EEZ. I contacted the mapper with a changeset comment and their motivation is based on "fixing the EEZ". Wikipedia suggests that Rockall is considered (administratively speaking) part of the isle of Harris, in the Western Isles. As Rockall has from time to time been the subject of a territorial dispute with Ireland, should we use the "disputed territories" process for Rockall? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86624359 _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
