Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.
Yes we do need to understand the data. If a usrn is given to a road,
then the road is extended is the extension included in the original usrn
or given a new usrn. Plenty of scope for decisions when using in OSM.
T
On 03/07/2020 16:55, Robert Skedgell wrote:
Surely these should be ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn, as UK is not an ISO
3166-1 alpha-2 country code?
Having had a quick look at USRN data, it appears that roads may have
more than one USRN, as a road may have more than one of 'Designated
Street Name', 'Officially Described Street', 'Numbered Street' and
'Unofficial Street Name'. In addition to this, some streets appear to
have a UPRN for the 'street record'.
On 03/07/2020 15:31, Tony OSM wrote:
As we have access to the data and Robert Whittaker has produced a great
UPRN locations map, how are we planning to tag OSM objects?
ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn
have been suggested as tags - I think this is the way to go.
There is also Key:ref:NPLG:UPRN:1 in the wiki.
Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?
The OS data applies them as nodes, they are assigned by local
authorities to a location as a node.
The uprn is applied to many objects even bus shelters, and individual
flats within a block; there may be what appear to be duplicates.
I suggest that for OSM buildings or building parts which are
individually linkable to a uprn then the uprn is assigned to the
building way outline; otherwise to an OSM node if the mapper deems
appropriate
Tony Shield --- TonyS999
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
