The changeset comment seems backwards to me, foot=designated is more specific than foot=yes (which would be the default for any mapped footpath).
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:12 PM Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: > What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we tag > all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is > "designation=public_footpath" enough? > > > > On 2020-07-10 13:54, Andrew Hain wrote: > > I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for > highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset in > Potlatch 1. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607 > > I got a changeset comment querying the edit. > > > > - I note you have removed foot=yes from highway=footway. My > understanding is that the default for a footway is foot=designated, but > designated requires an explicit sign. the paths on Wimbledon Common do not > have an explicit sign, but are legally accessible, hence foot=yes. Perhaps > osmose is wrong. > - Any comments? > - -- > - Andrew > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
