Thanks Jass - I was not aware of this excellent piece of work by Greg - do we know if the proposals "Possible import" were followed through?

I wonder if OS have other data for the 'benchmarks i.e. more precise than the data currently available.

On 23/08/2020 15:26, Jass Kurn wrote:
Gregrs has provided converted data for trig points, with the data obtained from a FOI request. They created a page to explain the process, and made available the converted data as a gpx file https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_triangulation_stations .

Jass

On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 15:13, Nick <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    My thinking was that most people surveying would not use accurate
    and precise systems such as differential GPS and/or RTK. So if
    these systems were used to accurately and precisely locate
    distinct local markers (i.e. trig points, benchmarks etc.) then
    local surveys could potentially use these to refine/check their
    own surveys. This approach would still be based on community input
    but could be used as an approach to education (e.g. local schools
    involved) as to how surveying works in practice.

    On 23/08/2020 12:27, SK53 wrote:
    This approach has been advocated in other European countries, and
    the Spanish community imported all the points of the national
    geodesic network (e.g., for Extremadura
    <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6041229#map=7/39.254/-6.124>).
    They more or less violate the idea of OSM as something which is
    community contributed (IIRC each point has "DO NOT MOVE") and
    often interfere with objects which do need mapping (churches are
    a particular point). It's not clear that this import has assisted
    improved accuracy of mapping in Spain.

    Many trig pillars are now way out of alignment and mainly of
    interest as an artefact. Even benchmarks might not have much
    relevance as OS surveying mainly uses differential GPS with
    reference to their own base network (OS Net
    
<https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business-government/tools-support/os-net/positioning>).
    (From the OS website "Ordnance Survey (OS) benchmarks and their
    heights haven't been regularly maintained for over 40 years.").

    OS Net is effectively proprietary, there are a limited number of
    open base stations for differential GPS in the UK. I do believe
    differential GPS (RTK) has a role to play in OSM surveying,
    although for specific purposes rather than generic improvement of
    feature alignment.

    Regards,

    Jerry

    On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 10:05, Nick <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I have been looking at what is recorded under this tag in my
        area. I see
        that there aren't that many and those that are on OSM refer
        to trig
        points (see also http://trigpointing.uk/). My thinking is
        that if these
        are accurate and precisely marked on OSM then perhaps they
        could be used
        for resolving issue such as aerial imagery offsets.

        I therefore wondered if it was worth using other data under
        this tag -
        specifically benchmarks
        (https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/benchmarks/)
        as there are huge numbers in the UK. If these were marked on
        OSM and
        their accuracy and precision verified (OS open data is to the
        nearest
        10m square and transforming that adds errors), they could be
        helpful in
        local surveys where they are less than accurate but also for
        ensuring
        that moving all nodes in an area is valid (not just to match
        aerial
        imagery). A possible linked organisation with data is
        https://www.bench-marks.org.uk/

        Incidentally, the benchmarks can be helpful if you need to align
        historical maps which have benchmarks shown.

        Any thoughts?


        _______________________________________________
        Talk-GB mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

    _______________________________________________
    Talk-GB mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to