On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 18:58, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah yes, a bit like when a hospital or school has a 'corridor room' (for > lack of a better term) joining two separate buildings. I'd go for three > joined buildings myself. > > And that newer building has been extended a bit more hasn't it? That part > I would merge with the existing building. > > I'd probably map as three joined building and transfer the hotel tags to a polygon that surrounds buildings, parking and grounds. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:56 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB < > talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> It sounds like three connected buildings, >> but one building with three building:part >> areas also would be acceptable >> >> >> 12 paź 2020, 18:52 od m...@good-stuff.co.uk: >> >> I was looking at tidying up a few things around my local area, and came >> across this: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.08855/-1.94195 >> >> What you can see there is a building labelled "Evesham Hotel" (which is >> correct), and, just to the south-west of it, another, unlabelled building. >> >> However, look at the aerial view (eg, via the edit feature, although >> Google Maps will do just as well), and it's clear that there is a link >> building connecting the two (something which I can confirm from local >> knowledge): >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/52.08855/-1.94195 >> >> (There's also an unmapped extension to the bottom left building, but >> that's another matter). >> >> That's because, many years ago when the manor house was converted to a >> hotel, the owners expanded the hotel by building the link to the adjacent >> building so that it's all one building internally (more of the >> accommodation is in the bottom left building, the original manor house is >> mostly reception, function and dining rooms and associated non-public areas >> such as kitchens and offices). >> >> So, how should this be mapped? Should the entire hotel, covering both >> original buildings and the later link building, be mapped as a single >> polygon? Or should they be mapped as three adjacent, but separate, >> polygons? Is there a standard way of approaching situations like this? >> >> Mark >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
