On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 02:21:43PM +0000, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02, ael via Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +0000, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > > wrote: > > > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > > > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . > > > > I took a look and it flagged up > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 > > as having no name. But it has a perfectly good name? > > It's not flagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3149722064 , it's > flagging the building next to it: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679205532 . That building is tagged > with shop=yes but no has name=* tag. When an issue concerns an > existing OSM object, you'll find a direct link to that object in the > popup bubble when you click/tap on the icon.
I thought that I tried that. I clicked on the edit, and that didn't works as I recall. I just tried again and now realize that the "shop=yes" is also a link, and indeed that worked. > > In this case see: https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/#19/51.7885/-1.4833 . > If the building is only that single shop, then you could remove the > shop node and transfer the tags to the building way. If the building > also has other uses (e.g. there's a flat above the shop, or it > contains more than one shop) then it might be better to remove the > shop=yes tag from the building, and move the shop node inside the > bounds of the building instead. A later mapper added the tag to the building without moving the shop node, and duplicating the shop tag hence this problem. I will update. ael _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
