Agreed, "point" sucks as a value, I won't use it....my fundamental reason for it not being a 'centre' was size, but a Recycling Point _could_ be seen as a mini Recycling Centre that only accepts recyclable waste. You can see a perimeter boundary by the concrete area it is set on. I could go with a site relation but you can't physically carry out other activities between the constituent objects (unlike a wind farm).
I will try with 'centre' and including '....Recycling Point' in the name. On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, 08:58 Dan S, <[email protected]> wrote: > Op do 26 nov. 2020 om 19:21 schreef Jez Nicholson <[email protected] > >: > >> Okay, bear with. I know that this is detailed mapping, but I enquired a >> while ago on the amenity:recycling talk page and a single recycling >> container == a single node. A group of containers == a group of nodes. >> >> Here is an image of the highly attractive Golf Drive Recycling Point >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Golf_Drive_Recycling_Point.jpg >> featuring 6 * "amenity"="recycling" + "recycling_type"="container" which >> accept different items including >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8168379145 glass, >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8168379151 cans, cardboard, paper, >> plastic bottles, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8168379142 a >> clothes bank. >> >> The area they are contained in is called "Golf Drive Recycling Point". >> There's a sign that says so. I've added a polygon >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/877940580 as "amenity"="recycling" + >> "recycling_type"="point" >> >> I can only really see containers or centres in >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/recycling_type#values but this >> place is neither. >> >> Are you offended by "amenity"="recycling" + "recycling_type"="point"? It >> seems like the UK term for it. >> >> > Honestly, "point" seems dangerously prone to misunderstanding, when used > as a value here in OSM. I know we tend to say "recycling point", but that > doesn't mean that we say "point". "I'll just go to the point". > > I wish I could suggest a good alternative word, e.g. a word we already use > for some other type of feature. > > What is the fundamental reason this is not a recycling_type=centre? Is it > the size? (If so, no problem - use "centre" on a suitable polygon.) Is it > the fact that it's unstaffed? (Could use self_service=only or > supervised=no.) Is it that there's no perimeter boundary? > > Best > Dan > > > >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 4:25 PM Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 26/11/2020 11:16, Jez Nicholson wrote: >>> > Am I missing something, or is there no concept of a Recycling Point in >>> OSM? >>> > Have you seen/used anything else? >>> >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:recycling_type> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Jeremy >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-GB mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
