NCN 6 has a particularly awkward example <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.99529/-1.19493&layers=C> (sorry no picture to hand) which is suitably tagged, and definitely signed. The ramp is (was?) not much more than a half-pipe.
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 18:53, Chris Hodges <ch...@c-hodges.co.uk> wrote: > NCR45 in Stroud goes down a rather steep flight of steps to cross > Dudbridge Road. I can confirm that is what the signs say, having been > there yesterday. Also the Sustrans/OS map shows it taking the line of > the steps https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/51.73875,-2.23631,18 > > There is a narrow ramp, so you can wheel a (conventional) bike up/down. > It's about as accessible as it sounds, but the north end of the path > isn't much better. > > On OSM the steps are shown (with a note about the bike route) > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/51.73895/-2.23568 but the > cycle path appears to break > > Mapillary shows the sign at the bottom: > > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.738716181265865&lng=-2.236989543797598&z=17&focus=map&menu=true&pKey=7X9gKmoDzGaATOILuDGRuA&x=0.14213485370109913&y=0.4081370298673949&zoom=3 > > > It's not unique - I know another example where the Bristol-Bath railway > path accesses the pub car park in Saltford > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/51.40521/-2.45026, and I've > seen similar on canal towpaths - in the latter case in particular it can > be crucial for route-planning even manually, as the next access can be a > long way away. > > So how should this be tagged to indicate that the bike route really does > go down the steps? > > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
