On 5 November 2024 10:02:49 GMT, Jez Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote: >Hmmm, I don't read the response as "this is an account shared between >multiple users". I read it as "this is an account for someone who has now >left the organisation but we will respond to any queries that may be raised >against it"...which in my mind would be quite a responsible thing to do.
Although the mapper making the correction should have used their own account, not the one of the mapper who has left the organisation. Phil (trigpoint) > >On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 9:16 AM Ken Kilfedder <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Morning all, >> >> I encounted an odd changeset at St Bart's hopsital. The Changeset >> hashtags identified it as a 'fixed' maproutlette challenge (Fixed building >> and highway intersection) promoted by TomTom. However, the change left a >> path going through a buiding. >> >> So I got in touch with the user via a changeset comment. The response >> indicated that the person who made the change is not the person who now >> controls the account. Is it normal for TomTom users to share their >> accounts amongst a pool of people (people who they seem to have records >> for, but which the wider OSM community can't attribute changes to?) >> >> Here's the changeset: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148955134 >> >> It doesn't seem like good practice to me, but perhaps it's >> normal/tolerated. Is this a job for DWG, should this 'users' changes be >> audited somehow, or is the best course of action to just quietly remove the >> unlikley path (which is still skewering the building). >> >> --- >> https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain >> [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
