"town house" sounds like an Americanism to me, likewise "row house".

I do sometimes feel that a group of 3 adjoined modern houses aren't really
"terraced", but by definition they are.

On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, 10:07 SK53, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I know exactly what you mean here (both my godson & my niece own such
> houses), but I think building=town_house is likely to be deeply ambiguous
> for someone not familiar with this usage. For instance the Wikipedia
> article.on British use of townhouse is illustrated with a building which
> looks like a small palace :
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townhouse_(Great_Britain). I think you
> need to accept house=terraced and use an additional tag.
>
> I've checked other locations and a surprisingly wide range of tags are
> used (my godsons house is building=residential), but most, including my own
> mapping use house=terraced. The relatively small number of uses for
> town_house are very widely distributed across the world predominantly in
> Europe and North America, but a few elsewhere, such as West Africa. Usage
> increased significantly fairly recently :
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/house=town_house. I'd suggest that
> the tag is probably used with different meanings.
>
> Terraced houses provide a certain difficulty in the UK because of their
> ubiquity across all income brackets & classes (Belgravia, or Regency Bath
> to the back streets, of say, Hartlepool). It would be useful to find a way
> of distinguishing between them. Your town houses represent one easily
> recognised subtype.
>
> There are one or two other housing types which are sufficiently
> distinctive, but which I've noticed get changed to a more generic tag: link
> detached houses (garage walls are shared between two houses), and
> maisonettes (particularly blocks of four). Chalet (or dormer) bungalows,
> and mews houses are others.
>
> I'd very tentatively suggest something like house=terraced,
> terraced=town_house (or even modern_town_house). An alternative might be
> integral_garage=yes.
>
> On a more general level there are other whole categories of residential
> properties which it would be interesting to be able to identify by tagging.
> I'm particularly interested in defective or non-standard housing such as
> the BISF house (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BISF_house), see this
> recent Mastodon thread https://en.osm.town/@SK53/114330002843070525. Some
> of this can be achieved by use of existing tags (for instance a chalet
> bungalow would have roof:levels=1), BUT that requires consistency in
> tagging (all bungalows would require a roof:level tag). I therefore think
> we could do with one or more additional tags to allow finer discrimination
> of housing types.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jerry
>
> PS. Stefan Muthesius wrote a fine scholarly work on the English Terraced
> House https://archive.org/details/englishterracedh0000stef
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, 09:01 John Rowbotham via Talk-GB, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all, I appear to be in dispute with a relatively new mapper about
>> one of the most popular forms of housing in my area.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've had several of my tags changed from terraced house to town house.
>> The mapper says town houses aren't valid.
>>
>>
>>
>> These are hundreds of domestic brick built properties constructed in the
>> last 7 years, all fitted with solar panels, some with vehicle access
>> through void parts of the ground floor area to gated parking at their
>> rears, some with 'attic dressing rooms' on their third floors.  Talking to
>> the original designers and planners of the estate, the idea (reflected in
>> marketing and promotion which spoke of 'modern town houses'), the intention
>> was to modernise the feel of traditional back-to-back Victorian terraces
>> common in the borough and mostly built in response to the 1880 Act.
>> Indeed, something that really interested the Royal team who visited during
>> the build was the difference between the old style and these 21st century
>> versions.
>>
>>
>>
>> So - is using 'town house' banned, as my correspondent says, or a useful
>> way to differentiate between 120 years' of connected domestic housing
>> design?  I'm happy to be overruled if we can't use the tags this way.  But
>> I did do the legwork on site to call the properties what they are known as
>> based on conversations with their builders.
>>
>>
>>
>> Changeset #165128178 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165128178>
>> is typical.  I did offer to meet the mapper at the nearby (excellent) pub
>> for a chat and share ideas but it seems now that he does most of his
>> mapping near Niagara Falls.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any tips or ideas, John.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to