On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 at 05:58, Robert Skedgell (OSM) < [email protected]> wrote:
> (Posted to the OSM Community Forum at > > https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/foot-access-tagging-on-signed-cycle-only-ways-in-the-uk/141329 > ) > > Where we have highway=cycleway ways explicitly signed as being for > cycles only, tagging of foot access in practice and the wiki are a > little inconsistent. > > The signs used are blue circular regulatory signs, but are not > enforceable in the same way as many other regulatory signs as s.36 RTA > 1988 does not apply. > > Tagging as foot=no conveys the intent, but as it isn’t really a > meaningful prohibition some people remove it or even replace it with a > potentially unhelpful foot=yes. I would like to suggest replacing it > with foot=discouraged and updating the wiki if the UK community are > happy with this. > > The most common sign in use here is, TSRGD diagram 955 “Route for use by > pedal cycles and electric scooters being used in a trial, only (not > intended for pedestrians)”. It is commonly used on dedicated cycle > “only” tracks. > > The other sign used is TSRGD diagram 957 “Route comprising two ways for > use by pedal cycles and electric scooters being used in a trial, only > and by pedestrians only, with those ways separated by a solid white > line, or by physical means”. Where the ways are separated by more than > just paint, they are often mapped as separate ways in OSM. > > What would be the preferred option for the highway=cycleway? > > -- > Robert Skedgell <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
