It's a bit like pubs. Around my way, they have an FHRS:ID for the wet sales
(the bar) and a separate FHRS:ID for the food, which is often subbed out to
someone else to provide. I end up with a separate node for the food, which
is fine by me.

On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, 22:32 Ken Kilfedder, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think you're right.  There shouldn't be multiple FHRS IDs for a single
> entity.   If there are two businesses in the same building, they should
> have two differrent OSM objects anyway, and if they're both on FHRS, then
> the next steps are obvious.
>
>
>
> ---
> https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain
> [email protected]
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, at 20:03, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
> Multiple FHRS:ID values on one entity.
>
> I've been in conversation with someone who believes adding multiple
> FHRS:ID values to one entity is the correct way to tag.
>
> For example, a school where, not only does it have it's own FHRS:ID, but
> the local authority employs external companies to provide facilities, such
> as school meals.
>
> This creates the problem of being unable retrieve data on the number of
> these companies from the OSM database as they're not explicitly named.
>
> He provided an example to justify his method, but I think it reinforces my
> point - RBS HQ in Scotland:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91156737
>
> This includes a Tesco express:
> https://www.tesco.com/store-locator/edinburgh/175-glasgow-rd
> https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/661909
>
> He claims it should be assigned to the building "as RBS building is a
> private business that we can't easily map the inside of & the shop
> inaccessible by the public or customers".
>
> Again, this prevents an accurate count of Tesco's shops.
>
> I perceive the employees as the customers, and giving the shop its own
> node & tags inside the building is still more accurate & detailed, even if
> the location within the building is rough guess.
>
> Am I missing some blatant logic?
>
> Cheers
> DaveF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to