By the way, I tried to buy the speed limit data for this app from Tom Tom but the initially engaged but when they heard I was using if statically they were not interested.
The licence to use it dynamically would not be cost effective and I would have to do a subscription service. The limits don't change often so it makes no sense to do it live. Anyway. Just for info. Donie > On 15 Mar 2014, at 15:02, Daniel Cussen <[email protected]> wrote: > > It would be useful if we got a firm no, before we start re-inventing the > wheel. > Personally I would not need an app. There are loads of OSM apps that > allow editing on the go. It would be useful to track the number of > zones entered to see if we are missing any. > >> On 14/03/2014, Donie Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: >> Would it be useful if I released an app that allowed you to mark the >> beginning and end of the zones? I could also gather the speed limit if you >> drive it at close to the limits? >> >> Could we get the community to help out? >> >> I'm thinking of releasing it for free. A paid option gets you live camera >> reports. >> >> I love to get your help so I can do this without risk of breaching >> copyrights. >> >> Donie >> >> On 14 Mar 2014, at 19:50, Daniel Cussen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I've just got a response from An Garda that my request has been passed up >>>> the >chain. >>>> Fingers crossed. >>>> Donie >>> >>> Donie Did you ever get an official response from the Gardai regarding >>> your request to use the data from Gardai.ie speedzones? >>> >>> I am very interested in putting in this data too. If we get the >>> official NO then we can begin mapping them ourselves and proactively >>> seeking them out and marking them. I travel on national routes >>> countrywide quite often so I could start getting the GPS positions of >>> the signs on each side of the road, if we cannot use the Gardai info. >>> >>> So the first thing should be to get an official respose, and if it is >>> yes then it should be easy to map the zones >>> >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement >>> >>> >>>> On 14/03/2014, Donie Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Can we add the restricted speed zones? The ones the go safe cameras are >>>> on? >>>> Just the speed limits on those stretches? >>>> >>>> I'm working on an app for the speed zones and I'd like to be able to pop >>>> up >>>> the speed limits as they are not always signed. >>>> >>>> I can statically scan for updates to release to the app when updates on >>>> the >>>> roads are implemented. >>>> >>>> Any objections on using the data for this? >>>> >>>> Donie >>>> >>>>> On 14 Mar 2014, at 18:27, da fo43 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello All, First >>>>> time posting on the mailing list but I've spoken individually to a >>>>> number of you already. There can't be too many roads still to map in >>>>> Ireland now so I guess the next step would be to improve the quality by >>>>> filling in road numbers, names, etc. So I'm going to propose a few >>>>> standards and see what people think. 1. Map L roads 1000 to 4999 >>>>> (Local Primary) as 'Tertiary' and all other public roads as >>>>> 'Unclassified' >>>>> or 'Residential'. >>>>> I know people have a lot of differing views on this and will admit that >>>>> some local primary roads seem to have less importance than Local >>>>> Secondary and Local Tertiary roads but really I think it's better to go >>>>> with what is designated rather than making judgement calls. On some >>>>> parts of the map all roads are being set to 'Tertiary' so really I >>>>> don't >>>>> think the current system works. All other roads are mapped as per >>>>> designation so I personally don't see why this should be any different. >>>>> 2. Labeling roads L1000-9999 with spaces. >>>>> I see on some parts of the map that roads are being labelled with a >>>>> space 'L 1234' instead of 'L1234'. I would be in favour of sticking to >>>>> one standard, and going with the majority in not using a space. >>>>> 3. Labeling roads over L9999. >>>>> I propose the labeling roads listed as L12341 as L1234-1 as >>>>> this makes it easier to read and work out which branch of >>>>> primary/secondary road it belongs to. I guess this might not suit >>>>> everyone. >>>>> >>>>> 4. Non public roads to be displayed as 'Service' or 'Track' only. >>>>> It's not always obvious if some roads are private (especially some >>>>> housing estates) but where it is known for certain they are private >>>>> then >>>>> I would be in favour of using a 'service' road rather than >>>>> 'residential' or 'unclassified'. >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully >>>>> we can agree on some things and apologies if I have overwritten >>>>> anyone's work recently, it's certainly not my intention to do so and I >>>>> will go with whatever the consensus is. Lastly I was planning on making >>>>> some small updates to the Wiki page, just a general cleanup on removing >>>>> dead links and adding a sat nav section, if anyone has any objections >>>>> please let me know. >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-ie mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-ie mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-ie mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ie mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie _______________________________________________ Talk-ie mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
