On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Some things are better as points. man_made=water_tap would be such a > small area that it would not be worth while mapping as an area. > Most initial mapping occurs as points - quicker and easier for the mapper. > And it does get the information across to the end user, the added > information of an area is helpfull but the added time of mapping the data > compared to the benefit is not as good as that of mapping it as a point. If > you have the time to spare than by all means map the area. If on the other > hand you can get more information onto the map by mapping things as points > then map as points. Greatest benefit for the least amount of work? > Makes perfect sense! -- Arun Ganesh (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad> <http://j.mp/ArunGanesh>
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
