According to the revenue from each station, IR has categoriesed railway stations in A1,A,B ...etc
There about 100 A1 railway stations in India On 12 Mar 2016 03:43, "Yogesh K S" <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. place=district makes sense. We should change this. > > Great, have updated the wiki - > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries#Administrative_divisions > and will change the values from county to district. > > 2. Looking at > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative it seems > like admin_level=6 is a popular choice for a district level unit in the > other big countries, larger than India. Its a good idea to use 6 for > consistency. And it allows use to use the 5 slot for the zonal councils. > > Right, admin_level=6 seems better for districts than 5. But how do we take > care of districts that are already tagged with 5? As most of the districts > have already been tagged 5 - > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.in/keys/admin_level#values, should we mass > replace them with 6 if the consensus is in favor of this here? > > And also values like A & A1 are used in combination with railway=station > tag - http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eWQ. Don't know what do these values > indicate in an administration boundary and relate to railway stations. > > > thanks, > yogi > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Yogesh K S <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Currently I see that we have tagged most of the Indian districts(more >> than 300) with place=county[1] but this tag is mainly used on nodes rather >> than on administrative boundaries ways that are tagged with >> boundary=administrative.[2] But we have added administrative boundaries for >> all districts in India[3] and haven't tagged with place tags. And also we >> have used admin_level=5 for all district boundaries but the wiki shows >> admin_level=6 for district boundaries.[4] >> >> Request the community to comment or provide suggestions on - >> >> 1. Whether to use place=district instead of place=county since we >> refer them as districts on the ground in India.[2] >> 2. Whether to update the India wiki page to avoid confusion on using >> admin_level=5 for districts considering we haven't added revenue division >> boundaries[4]. >> >> >> [1]taginfo.openstreetmap.in/tags/place=county >> [2] >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Administratively_declared_places >> [3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_districts_in_India >> [4] >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries#Administrative_divisions >> >> >> cheers, >> yogi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-in mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in >> > > > > -- > Arun Ganesh > (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-in mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-in mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
