Hilsen til deg.

I see no reason to object to this.

Also, tagging natural=fjord is a common tagging mistake according to the
"Tag:bay=fjord" OSM wiki page.

With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval

On þri 10.apr 2018 13:16, Fredrik wrote:
> God dag islendinger,
>
> I have thought of sending this email for some time, so here it is.
>
> There are about 120 natural=fjords in OSM and most of them are around
> Iceland. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/xLM
>
> Would any of you object if I change these natural=fjords to
> natural=bay and add bay=fjord? Or possibly if someone at Iceland can
> fix this?
>
> There was some discussion about this at the Norwegian list in 2016
> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=no&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.nuug.no%2Fpipermail%2Fkart%2F2016-January%2F005860.html&edit-text=&act=url
> .
>
> The result was an agreement that fjord is a subtype of bay and instead
> of fighting to get fjords rendered in the map tagging them as
> suggested here would fix everything.
>
> There is a github issue open for the default map style (carto)
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/788 related
> to rendering fjords
>
>
> /FredrikLindseth
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FredrikLindseth
>
> Norway
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-is mailing list
> Talk-is@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-is


_______________________________________________
Talk-is mailing list
Talk-is@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-is

Reply via email to