Ciao talk-it oggi ho avuto uno scambio di idee con il mapper krispyduck, che riporto sotto:
============================ DAVIDE: Ciao krispyduck sono Davide, ho visto le tue modifiche in Piazza Bra (Verona) e secondo me non sono corrette. Piazza Bra è già mappata come area pedonane, secondo me non ha senso disegnare all'interno di questa altre highway (highway=footway) o (foot=designated highway=pedestrian motor_vehicle=no name=Piazza Bra) Cosa ne pensi? ------------------------------------------------------- krispyduck: Hi Davide I do not speak Italian but I understand your message (thank you Google). The reason I drew pedestrian roads on top of a pedestrian area is to allow routing applications (like Osmand) to work. These will not route through an area and so avoid the piazza altogether which makes no sense. By putting a pedestrian road on top of the the area the roads are usually rendered in the same colour and so appear "invisible" but the routing software can use the "ways" to correctly route a pedestrian through the area. However, If you don't like it I am happy that you delete the ways ------------------------------------------------------- krispyduck: Hello again. Out of interest I decided to check how this routing problem was solved in similar areas. If you look at Piazza Santo Marco in Venzia somebody has used the same technique to allow routing through the piazza. I think this is a good and unobtrusive way to allow 'foot' routing through an area. It also allows the ways to be connected to nearby roads at a place with a pedestrian crossing. But, like most things on OSM, there is never just one way to do things :) ============================ 1) esistono software di routing che utilizzano correttamente le aree (siano queste pedonali o altro ?) 2) al di la che esistano o meno, non s'era detto: "il software deve adattarsi sui dati e non il contrario"? Ciao Davide
_______________________________________________ Talk-it mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
