On 20.07.25 21:01, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote:
Secondo la tabella per l'Italia [2] highway=path + bicycle=designated
NON equivale a highway=cycleway.
hoghway=cycleway implica foot=no
highway=path continua a essere foot=yes anche se ci metti
bicycle=designated. Non vedo scritto da nessuna parte il contrario
Il contrario sta scritto nel proposal[1], votato e approvato, dove trovi
i seguenti tre esempi:
1) "highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=yes is supposed to be
equivalent to highway=cycleway,foot=yes"
2) "highway=path+foot=designated is supposed to be equivalent to
highway=footway"
3) "highway=path+horse=designated+bicycle=yes+foot=yes is in some
countries equivalent to highway=bridleway"
Ad 1) Se fosse come dici tu, il primo foot=yes sarebbe superfluo, e gli
autori del proposal avrebbero scritto semplicemente
"highway=path+bicycle=designated is supposed to be equivalent to
highway=cycleway,foot=yes"
Ad 2) Per analogia si arriva a: "highway=path+bicycle=designated is
supposed to be equivalent to highway=cycleway", come dico io.
Ad 3) Non puo' essere come dici tu perche' allora bicycle=yes e foot=yes
sarebbero superflui, etc.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Path
mfg
--
Marcello Perathoner
marce...@perathoner.de
_______________________________________________
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
