Hi List, +1 to discard yh:WIDTH.
Appendix; The reason why "yh:WIDTH" still leave is "maybe future mapper may use this information to apply width tag." https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2012-October/006797.html But 3 years pass since discussion, no approach could be made. And as Douglas said, many of yh:WIDTH value are wrong or estimate. 2015-10-14 20:42 GMT+09:00 Douglas Perkins <doug...@dperkins.org>: > On 10/14/2015 03:20 PM, Arun Ganesh wrote: > > こんにちは > In the data issues post[1] we noticed that the yh:WIDTH tag was not > consistent and causes conflicts when trying to merge roads. Taichi-san > already mentioned we could delete them and am thinking of adding it to the > list of discardable tags in iD[2] and JOSM > > This will make it easy for new mappers to start merging ways without > worrying about these tags. Good idea? > > I think so. That width data is wrong most of the time, in my observation. > > [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MAPconcierge/diary/36106 > [2] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/data/discarded.json > > -- > Arun Ganesh > (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ja mailing > listTalk-ja@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ja mailing list > Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja > > -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
