Hi everybody, I want to propose minimum requirements to consider an area mapped in Mapazonia. Some contributors are mapping native forest, like in here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-14.6257/-54.2441 It looks great on the map. At first I tought it would be better to map only rivers and leave landuse to a second phase. But why not map native forest right now? It is information as much as valuable as rivers', if not more. So my propose to consider a area mapped is: - all waterways mapped (river middle lines); - all riverbanks mapped (not for thinner streams); - all native forest mapped (but not deforestated areas as they are harder to classify); - all rural roads (using highway=track?); What do you think? Abraços, Vitor
_______________________________________________ talk-latam mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-latam
