On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:46:47AM +0300, Tomas Straupis wrote: > Sveiki > > Įdėjau į wiki info apie gatvių sutrumpinimus. > > Beje, pastebėjote, kad wikyje yra toks komentaras (discussion dalyje) > > "If one looks at Tagging_samples/urban, it seems that most of what > is recommended to be marked unclassified in this page is actually > supposed to be residential. Of course, given that both are rendered > exactly the same, it's just a minor point. However, this article > should also stress that marking access roads to blocks of flats should > be done with living street, because I've seen people using residential > for this, and that looks just wrong. Just my rookie opinion though. > Carneyfex 08:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)" > > Bent jau dėl "living street" aš galvojau, kad taip žymimos gatvės, > kurios savo ruožtu yra pažymėtos ženklu 552 Gyvenamoji zona > (http://www.automokyklos.lt/ket/nurodomieji-zenklai). > Residential dedamas miestų gatvėse, kurios turi pavadinimą, ir > kurios nėra dalis kažkokio svarbaus valstybinio kelio ar šiaip yra > "didelės" (tuo atveju dedasi primary, secondary ir pan.). Taip?
Mano supratimu, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features su tavimi visiškai sutinka. Ir kelio ženklas visai tas pats nuotraukoje pavaizduotas prie living_street. Marius Gedminas -- Most security experts REALLY believe in firewalls. The expect that, when they die, arrive at the great firewall in the sky where Saint Peter is running a default policy of REJECT. --- Sander Plomp
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-lt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt
