On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In NL we have two parties, the Residentials and the Unclassifieds.
Actually, you missed the third group: people like me who beleive that residential=(unclassified+abutters=residential) and as such the tag should be abolished altogether. And that perhaps the abutters tag should be abolished also, in favour of areas. > Now with the AND import coming soon, we have to decide how to converse AND > local streets, to residential or unclassified. We firstly, the AND contains areas describing industrial zones and such so you can easily see where people live. This is a far better solution than tag roads. And secondly, unless you see a way to look at the data and determine one way or the other, we have to make either *all* streets unclassified or *all* street residential. I think you'll agree that the former choice is obviously better. > So, is there actually an intelligent design behind residential versus > unclassified, or is it just survival of the fittest? Can we look for > guidance, or will there be no answer? Well, as far as the renderers are concerned, they agree with the third position, have for months and don't appear to be changing their mind. In the long run though, I don't think it matters. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ Talk-nl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-nl
