<<subject changed from "Updated OSMPH Imagery Coverage Map">>
Hi Ed, It's possible that if those waypoints were taken on a vehicle cruising along at 60kph and the waypoint was taken a second or 2 too late, then that might account for the discrepancy in position. :) There was no Bing imagery before when those boundaries were added. I guess we can now adjust the lines to match the actual positions of the arches in the Bing imagery. It's the best data we have so far for the actual locations of the municipal boundaries. Eugene On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Ed Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh I see... Thanks Wayne and Eugene. > > From the screen print of Bing Imagery in JOSM, the Bani boundary marker > line is off by only about 25 meters from the actual arch. The Bolinao > marker is marked a bit farther off though. The Alaminos marker is good as > bullseye! > > :>) ed > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Ed, >> >> As Wayne said, these are administrative borders marking the location >> of the boundary between the municipalities, at least where the lines >> intersect the road. >> >> >> Hi Wayne, >> >> These are OK (though they could be a bit shorter). No need to worry. :) >> >> >> Eugene >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Wayne Manuel <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Oh hi, >> > >> > I was the one who put them there. As temporary dividers between >> > municipalities. When we passed by those markers that welcome you along >> > the >> > national highway, I put a straight line perpendicular to that. Or is >> > this >> > not good practice? >> > >> > Sorry about that. >> > >> > Wayne Manuel >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Ed Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Eugene, >> >> >> >> Just wondering what these straight lines near Alaminos and Bani are >> >> for? >> >> are they also imagery outlines? >> >> >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=16.1869&lon=119.9511&zoom=12&layers=M >> >> >> >> :>) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi guys, >> >>> >> >>> Based on the response to my other e-mail, I've gone ahead and deleted >> >>> all known imagery outline ways in the Philippines from the database. >> >>> >> >>> I have also updated the Imagery Coverage Map and added the outline for >> >>> the QuickBird imagery in Pangasinan, and the EO-1 imagery in >> >>> Negros.[1] >> >>> >> >>> I have also created an online Github repository containing the >> >>> required files for this map so that other people can help update >> >>> it.[2] The most interesting file in that repository is the data.osm >> >>> file which is an OSM file that contains the imagery outlines.[3] So >> >>> instead of adding the outlines to the main OSM database, this file >> >>> should be updated. And from there I can update the web map to reflect >> >>> the changes. >> >>> >> >>> [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ >> >>> [2] https://github.com/OSMPH/Imagery_Coverage_Map >> >>> [3] https://github.com/OSMPH/Imagery_Coverage_Map/blob/master/data.osm >> >>> >> >>> Enjoy! :-D _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
