Thanks again, Pierre, First of all, I think I made that roundabout ages ago and forgot to add the junction=roundabout tag. Fixed. That will surely help! I've also fixed unnamed road sections near roundabouts, so I will rest the routing again later when it has been updated.
What do the rest of you think of renaming all ref tags to ref:ph? I know it would make sense here, and probably everywhere outside of Metro Manila, but what about Manila? I assume C-5 is this type of reference, and it's in common use there, isn't it? But I also think EDSA has a reference that nobody cares about, so it's not consistent. If the consensus is that we would be better off putting these tags on hold (making them ref:ph instead of ref), I assume this could be done through a batch routine? We would have to make very sure that we only remove references that are confusing, not ones that are actually in use, if any. Ronny. On 2015-02-19 11:12, Pierre Béland wrote: > Hi Ronny, > > for the refs that are not implemented yet (ie no signs on the road), you > could convert to ref:ph > This way, it would keep the reference and it would be easy later to convert > back. > > On the map, both the ref and the road name are showed. I am not sure that > the name will be showed by the routing applications if you remove the ref. > You will see the result if you look at areas where there is no ref. > > About the roundabout in the calculator, we see in this link that small > segments with no names are reported as unamed. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=15.1653%2C120.6177%3B15.2239%2C120.5914#map=20/15.16086/120.60972&layers=H > > You could try to discuss on the osm main list about this reporting how this > new routing feature could be enhanced. > > > > Pierre >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
