You should have taken a picture of that map! :) On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Erwin Olario <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It could be based on barangay membership to a district, I remeber > encountering some map from city hall about that a few years back. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can >> tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these >> districts. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with >>> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, >>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those >>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >>> area)? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk-ph mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > -- > > -- Dispatched by mental telepathy via Ansible >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
